Negative comments must be taken seriously, at least show the courtesy of describing the circumstances in as much detail as there is. We're Mac users, not Pee Cee users, just run Apple System Profiler before posting catastrophic comments that must be taken seriously. One more small request - then tell us why Apple's beta testers didn't do their jobs.Īm I asking too much? Look.
2.7 Based on 52 user reviews Follow this app Developer website AirPort Utility overview Use AirPort Utility to set up and manage your 802.11n and 802.11ac AirPort base stations, including AirPort Express, AirPort Extreme, and AirPort Time Capsule. Or, maybe you're 100% right and it crashes every newly bought unmodified Mac! AirPort Utility Version 6.3.1 Set up and manage your Wi-Fi network and AirPort base stations. If a particular upgrader is going to hose every mackers directory, at least post how you configured your Mac so we'll know which Macs will be affected. Maybe you forgot to unplug all the firewire cables, maybe you have some bizzare PCI card, maybe you're running SCSI. To those heros out there who sacrifice their macs to determine that an upgrader "sucks, crashes, and erases everything", how about going to System Profiler and post everything you have on your Mac prior to performing the catastrophic upgrade. Then the next upgrader comes along and what's the first comment? "It sucks, crashes, and destroys everything." Were there no beta testers? Granted, it's useless to ask anyone from Apple.
#Apple airport utility mac os x upgrade
postings are taken seriously enough that I, for one, will skip the upgrade and wait on the the next. These "it sucks, crashes, and destroyed my directory" etc. Some qualify what they post, some just post that "it sucks and crashes."
On just about every one of these Apple upgraders, someone or more than one macker posts negative comments. So what's the bottom line? Incompatible with PPOE and DSL? Is this an upgrade to be skipped? Yes? No? Maybe?
0 kommentar(er)
